DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.

Filing 76

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED. THE MOTION OF DAVID WOOD TO INTERVENE (DOC. NO. 71) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/23/20. 9/23/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P., Defendant. : : : : : : : : Civ. No. 18-2447 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 60), all related filings (Doc. Nos. 63–66), and all exhibits and affidavits attached to the submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. The Motion of David Wood to intervene (Doc. No. 71) is DENIED as moot. AND IT IS SO ORDERED /s/ Paul S. Diamond _______________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?