DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.
Filing
76
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED. THE MOTION OF DAVID WOOD TO INTERVENE (DOC. NO. 71) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/23/20. 9/23/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER
NETWORK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 18-2447
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion
for Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 60), all related filings (Doc. Nos. 63–66), and all exhibits and
affidavits attached to the submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is
DENIED.
The Motion of David Wood to intervene (Doc. No. 71) is DENIED as moot.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
_______________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?