GADDIS v. BRANDYWINE SENIOR CARE, INC.

Filing 26

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S AGE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 9/10/2019. 9/12/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRENDA GADDIS v. : : : : : : : BRANDYWINE SENIOR CARE, INC. d/b/a BRANDYWINE SENIOR LIVING AT HAVERFORD ESTATES CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-2479 ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant for summary judgment (Doc. # 18) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: (1) the motion is DENIED with respect to plaintiff’s age discrimination claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa. Stat. §§ 951 et seq; and (2) the motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff’s disability discrimination claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa. Stat. §§ 951 et seq. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?