WALTERS v. BERRYHILL

Filing 21

ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED. THE COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY DECISION IS AFFIRMED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/14/19. 8/15/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHANDRA WALTERS,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 18-2596

v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2019, upon careful consideration of
Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (ECF No. 16).
Defendant’s Response (ECF No. 17) and the Report and Recommendation filed by
United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (ECF No. 19), and it appearing
that neither plaintiff nor the Commissioner have objected to the report,1 it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s request for review is DENIED;
3. The Commission of Social Security’s decision is AFFIRMED; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
1

When no objection is made to a Report and Recommendation, the Court should, as a matter
of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept
the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes; see also Oldrati v. Apfel, 33 F.
Supp. 2d 397, 399 (E.D. Pa. 1998). No clear error appears on the face of the record and the Court
accordingly accepts Judge Caracappa’s Recommendation.

1