DENNIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
205
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIAS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE CERTAIN HEARSAY OR UNAUTHENTICATED DOCUMENTS (ECF NO. 121), PLAINTIFF JAMES DENNIS OPPOSITION THERETO, AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON THE MOTION, IT IS ORDERED THE MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 4/10/2024. 4/10/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES DENNIS
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 18-2689
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant City of
Philadelphia’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Certain Hearsay or Unauthenticated Documents (ECF
No. 121), Plaintiff James Dennis’ opposition thereto, and the supplemental briefing on the Motion,
it is ORDERED the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. 1
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
1
Defendant City of Philadelphia has moved to bar Dennis from introducing five pieces of
evidence at trial. City’s Mot. Preclude Evidence 1-2, ECF No. 121. As explained at the final
pretrial conference held on April 10, 2024, the Court will reserve its decision on all five pieces of
evidence for trial. The City’s motion is therefore denied without prejudice to reassertion.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?