DENNIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
304
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND POSTJUDGMENT INTEREST (ECF NO. 267), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO POSTJUDGMENT INTEREST, WHICH WILL BE AWARDED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1961(A) AFTER DENNIS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS IS ADJUDICATED. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PREJUDGMENT INTEREST. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/30/24. 8/30/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lisad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES DENNIS
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 18-2689
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff James Dennis’
Motion for Prejudgment Interest and Postjudgment Interest (ECF No. 267), Defendants Frank
Jastrzembski and Manuel Santiago’s response in opposition, and the additional briefing on the
Motion, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motion
is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
•
The Motion is GRANTED as to postjudgment interest, which will be awarded pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) after Dennis’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is adjudicated.
•
The Motion is DENIED as to prejudgment interest.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?