DENNIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
54
ORDER THAT AFTER CONSIDERING THE MOTION TO STAY FILED BY DEFENDANTS FRANK JASTRZEMBSKI AND MANUEL SANTIAGO [ECF NO. 47] AND THE RESPONSE THERETO, AND AFTER A HEARING ON THE RECORD, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE MOTION TO STAY WILL BE GRANT ED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM; 2. THE OBLIGATION OF DEFENDANTS JASTRZEMBSKI AND SANTIAGO TO ATTEND THEIR OWN DEPOSITIONS IS STAYED PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/20/2022. 5/20/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)
Case 2:18-cv-02689-ER Document 54 Filed 05/20/22 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES DENNIS,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL., :
:
Defendants.
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 18-02689
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of May 2022, after considering the
motion to stay filed by Defendants Frank Jastrzembski and Manuel
Santiago [ECF No. 47] and the response thereto, and after a
hearing on the record, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The motion to stay will be GRANTED for the reasons stated
in the accompanying memorandum;
2. The obligation of Defendants Jastrzembski and Santiago to
attend their own depositions is STAYED pending further
order of the Court;
3. Beginning sixty days from the date of this order, and
every sixty days thereafter, Defendants Jastrzembski and
Santiago shall submit a status report to the Court
updating the Court on the status of Commonwealth v.
Jastrzembski, MC-51-CR-0015176-2021 and Commonwealth v.
Case 2:18-cv-02689-ER Document 54 Filed 05/20/22 Page 2 of 2
Santiago, MC-51-CR-0015178-2021, so the Court can
consider whether the stay shall remain in place; and
4. In light of the changing circumstances, any party may
move to lift the stay for good cause.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?