SLUPSKI v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
ORDERED AND DECREED THAT: 1. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO THE STATUTORY BAD FAITH CLAIM OF COUNT III IN THE COMPLAINT; 2. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO THE COMMON LAW BAD FAITH CLAIM OF COUNT III, AND; 3. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON STACKING ISSUES IS DENIED AS MOOT, AS IT RELATES TO A COUNT ONLY PRESENT IN THE REJECTED AMENDED COMPLAINT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 7/14/2021. 7/14/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
AND NOW, this __14th__ day of July 2021, upon consideration of Defendant Nationwide
Mutual Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 35), Plaintiff Frank Slupski’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 37), and the opposing responses to both Motions (ECFs
39 and 41), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:1
1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the statutory
bad faith claim of Count III in the Complaint;
2. Summary Judgment is DENIED as to the common law bad faith claim of Count
3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on stacking issues is DENIED
AS MOOT, as it relates to a count only present in the rejected Amended
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
This Order accompanies the Court’s Memorandum Opinion dated July 14, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?