CROCKETT v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al

Filing 275

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 9/15/22. 9/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00276-WB Document 275 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re Injectafer Products Liability Litigation CIVIL ACTION ALL CASES NO. 19-276 ORDER And now, this 15th day of September 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 261), Defendants’ opposition thereto (ECF No. 262), and Plaintiffs’ reply (ECF No. 263), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike is GRANTED with respect to the following errata: Kapadia Errata 322:15, 323:24; D’Sylva Errata 324:18, 357:21-23; and Bregman Errata 306:1216, 408:8-12, 494:22-495:1. 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike is DENIED with respect to the following errata as well as remaining errata not addressed specifically by the Motion: Bregman Errata 247:20-22, 248:5, 284:13-15, 285:6, 405:4-8, 553:10-13; Koch Errata 316:20; Butcher Errata 245:23; Quadri Errata 279:23; Mundy Errata 227:5, 307:19, 309:6-13, 310:4, 310:13, 314:2-3, 315:24; and Simon Errata 145:17, 229:10-11. 1 Case 2:19-cv-00276-WB Document 275 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2 of 2 3. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs’ request to reopen depositions in which the Court has approved errata changes proposed by Defendants. BY THE COURT: /S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?