BISHOP v. MCGINLEY et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. PETITIONERS PETITION FOR STAY OF OBEYANCE IS DENIED. PETITIONERS MOTION REQUESTING ORDER FOR PSYCH RECORDS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/14/21. 7/14/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KALVIN BISHOP CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1461 Petitioner, v. THOMAS MCGINLEY, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of July 2021, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and all related filings; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa and the objections thereto; and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 22] is APPROVED and ADOPTED as set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion; 3. Petitioner’s “Petition for Stay of Obeyance” [Doc. No. 27] is DENIED; 4. Petitioner’s motion “requesting order for psych records” [Doc. No. 38] is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?