BISHOP v. MCGINLEY et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. PETITIONERS PETITION FOR STAY OF OBEYANCE IS DENIED. PETITIONERS MOTION REQUESTING ORDER FOR PSYCH RECORDS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/14/21. 7/14/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1461
THOMAS MCGINLEY, et al.,
AND NOW, this 14th day of July 2021, upon careful and independent consideration of
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and all related filings; and after review of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa and the objections
thereto; and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby
1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 22] is APPROVED and ADOPTED as
set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion;
3. Petitioner’s “Petition for Stay of Obeyance” [Doc. No. 27] is DENIED;
4. Petitioner’s motion “requesting order for psych records” [Doc. No. 38] is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?