POWERS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 65 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/18/23. 5/18/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
Case 2:19-cv-04685-MSG Document 71 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al.,
AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2023, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 65), and the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons set
out in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
All claims against Defendants Locks and Waddell are DISMISSED.
All claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (including retaliation claims
under that Act) and for disability discrimination under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act are
The motion is DENIED as to:
a. Powers’s race discrimination claims against Defendants SEPTA (Title VII and
the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act) and Benson (42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the
Pennsylvania Human Relations Act) in regard to Powers’s one-day suspension;
Case 2:19-cv-04685-MSG Document 71 Filed 05/18/23 Page 2 of 2
b. Powers’s retaliation claims against Defendants SEPTA (Title VII and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act) and Benson (the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act) in regard to Powers’s one-day suspension and termination.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?