FENNELL v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC et al

Filing 88

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS THEREFORE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/16/2022. 9/16/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-04750-MMB Document 88 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KLAYTON FENNELL v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-4750 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC & COMCAST CORPORATION ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTON TO STRIKE AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2022, upon review of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 31) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Declaration of Sandra Lau (ECF 53), as well as all submissions and oral argument related thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Complaint is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk shall close this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 19\19-4750 Fennell v Comcast\19cv4750 Order Re MSJ.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?