ROSADO v. BARRACKS et al

Filing 34

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 18 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. ALL ROSADO'S CLAIMS OTHER THAN HIS FALSE ARREST CLAIM AGAINST DUGAN AND FAILURE TO INTERVENE CLAIM AGAINST RAWLS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/11/22. 1/11/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE; E-MAILED.(amas)

Case 2:19-cv-05068-GJP Document 34 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 19-5068

v.
MICHAEL P. DUGAN, et al.,
Defendants.
PAPPERT, J.

January 11, 2022
ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of January 2022, upon consideration of the Motion to
Dismiss filed by Defendants Michael Dugan, Reginald Rawls and Codi Simcox (ECF 18)
and Plaintiff Geronimo Rosado’s Response (ECF 25, 26), it is ORDERED that the
Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All Rosado’s claims other
than his false arrest claim against Dugan and failure to intervene claim against Rawls
are dismissed with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

1