RUBIN v. MANGAN et al

Filing 44

ORDER RE: 38 AND 39 MOTIONS TO DISMISSIt is FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to theEastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 2/17/21. 2/17/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl, )

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-05301-AB Document 44 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RENE ROTHSTEIN RUBIN, Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 19-5301 : : MICHAEL P. MANGAN, ESQ., MANGAN & GINSBERG LLP, and MICHAEL ROTHSTEIN, Defendants. : : : ORDER AND NOW, on this 17th day of February, 2021, it is ORDERED that Michael Rothstein’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) is disposed of as follows: • The motion to dismiss for improper venue is GRANTED to the extent that venue is improper in this district. • The motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Michael P. Mangan, Esq. and Mangan & Ginsberg, LLP’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39) is disposed of as follows: • The motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. • The motion to dismiss for improper venue is GRANTED to the extent that venue is improper in this district. Case 2:19-cv-05301-AB Document 44 Filed 02/17/21 Page 2 of 2 • The motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT. • The motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is DENIED AS MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). _____s/ANITA B. BRODY, J._________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?