RUBIN v. MANGAN et al
Filing
44
ORDER RE: 38 AND 39 MOTIONS TO DISMISSIt is FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to theEastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 2/17/21. 2/17/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl, )
Case 2:19-cv-05301-AB Document 44 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RENE ROTHSTEIN RUBIN,
Plaintiff,
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
v.
:
No. 19-5301
:
:
MICHAEL P. MANGAN, ESQ.,
MANGAN & GINSBERG LLP,
and MICHAEL ROTHSTEIN,
Defendants.
:
:
:
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 17th day of February, 2021, it is ORDERED that Michael
Rothstein’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) is disposed of as follows:
•
The motion to dismiss for improper venue is GRANTED to the extent that
venue is improper in this district.
•
The motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED AS
MOOT.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Michael P. Mangan, Esq. and Mangan & Ginsberg,
LLP’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39) is disposed of as follows:
•
The motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED.
•
The motion to dismiss for improper venue is GRANTED to the extent that
venue is improper in this district.
Case 2:19-cv-05301-AB Document 44 Filed 02/17/21 Page 2 of 2
•
The motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED AS
MOOT.
•
The motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is DENIED AS MOOT.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to the
Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
_____s/ANITA B. BRODY, J._________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?