Taylor v. PA Attorney General et al

Filing 24

ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 IS DENIED. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 3/31/21. 3/31/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TYRONE TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-cv-1050 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March , 20___, upon careful 21 and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: /s/ Berle M. Schiller BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?