Williams v. THE KINTOCK GROUP, INC. et al

Filing 63

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT THE KINTOCK GROUP, INC. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 45 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/2/22. 8/2/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01915-HB Document 63 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES WILLIAMS : : : : : v. THE KINTOCK GROUP, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1915 ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2022, for the reasons set forth in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The motion of defendant The Kintock Group, Inc. for summary judgment (Doc. #45) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (2) Summary judgment is granted on Count II in favor of defendant The Kintock Group and against plaintiff James Williams as to plaintiff’s claim under the Fourteenth Amendment. (3) Summary judgment is granted on Count IV in favor of defendant The Kintock Group and against plaintiff James Williams as to plaintiff’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. (4) The motion of defendant is otherwise DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?