CONTOUR DATA SOLUTIONS LLC v. GRIDFORCE ENERGY MANAGEMENT LLC et al

Filing 402

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT CONTOURS MOTION TO SEAL CERTAIN INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS [DOC. NO. 337] AND CONTOURS SECOND MOTION TO SEAL CERTAIN INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS [DOC. NO. 355] ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. GRIDFORCES FIRST MOTION TO S EAL [DOC. NO. 340], GRIDFORCES SECOND MOTION TO SEAL [DOC. NO. 359], AND GRIDFORCES THIRD MOTION TO SEAL [DOC. NO. 372] ARE GRANTED. GRIDFORCE MOTION TO SEAL RESPONSE TO RECORD SUPPLEMENT [DOC. NO. 394] IS DENIED. WITHIN 14 DAYS, GRIDFORCE AND CONT OUR SHALL MEET AND CONFER TO ACHIEVE THE APPROPRIATE REDACTIONS AND THEN RE-FILE THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE, AND RESPONSES, ALL IN CONFORMITY WITH THIS COURTS ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED NOT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY FILE THESE AS NEW MOTIONS, AS THEY HAVE ALL BEEN DECIDED AND RULED UPON. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE CDW CORPORATION AND CDW DIRECT, LLCS (TOGETHER, CDW) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ACCOMPANYING DECLARATION [DOC. NOS. 341, 349] AND CDWS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CONTOURS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ACCOMPANYING DECLARATION [DOC. NOS. 357, 360], AS CDW CORPORATION AND CDW DIRECT, LLC ARE NO LONGER PARTIES TO THIS CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/29/24. 8/29/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CONTOUR DATA SOLUTIONS LLC
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-3241

GRIDFORCE ENERGY
MANAGEMENT LLC, et al.
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of August 2024, upon consideration of Contour and
Gridforce’s Motions to Seal and the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons stated in
the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Contour’s Motion to Seal Certain Information and Exhibits [Doc. No. 337] and Contour’s
Second Motion to Seal Certain Information and Exhibits [Doc. No. 355] are GRANTED
in part and DENIED in part.
2. Gridforce’s First Motion to Seal [Doc. No. 340], Gridforce’s Second Motion to Seal
[Doc. No. 359], and Gridforce’s Third Motion to Seal [Doc. No. 372] are GRANTED.
3. Gridforce Motion to Seal Response to Record Supplement [Doc. No. 394] is DENIED.
4. Within 14 days, Gridforce and Contour shall meet and confer to achieve the appropriate
redactions and then re-file their Motions for Summary Judgment, Motions to Exclude,
and responses, all in conformity with this Court’s accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED not to administratively file these as new motions, as
they have all been decided and ruled upon.

5. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to strike CDW
Corporation and CDW Direct, LLC’s (together, “CDW”) Motion for Summary Judgment
and accompanying Declaration [Doc. Nos. 341, 349] and CDW’s Response in Opposition
to Contour’s Motion for Summary Judgment and accompanying Declaration [Doc. Nos.
357, 360], as CDW Corporation and CDW Direct, LLC are no longer parties to this case.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

2