SANDOZ INC. v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC.
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT LANNETT'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. NO. 72 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. FACT DISCOVERY IS CLOSED EXCEPT FOR UNRESOLVED ISSUES THAT REQUIRE RESOLUTION THROUGH MOTIONS TO COMPEL. DEADLINES SET FOR TH IN THE MOST RECENT CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER REGARDING THE EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ARE STAYED UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE ARBITRATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 7/16/21. 7/16/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LANNETT COMPANY, INC.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-3538
This 16th day of July, 2021, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Lannett’s Motion to Compel, ECF 72, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as
follows. Plaintiff Sandoz, Inc. is ordered to produce all documents responsive to
Lannett’s Request for Production #17, including, but not limited to, pleadings, briefs,
document productions, expert reports, and other discovery material that were or will be
submitted, produced, or otherwise tendered by Sandoz to the Arbitrator. This order does
not extend to documents that were or will be produced solely in connection with
Cediprof’s counterclaims. Depositions and expert reports will also be governed by this
Order once they are produced and exchanged between the parties to the arbitration.
2. Fact discovery is CLOSED, except for unresolved issues that require resolution through
motions to compel.
3. Deadlines set forth in the most recent Case Management Order regarding the exchange of
expert reports and dispositive motions are STAYED until the completion of the
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?