KORNAFEL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al

Filing 4

ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS MALICIOUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B)(I) FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE; NO LATER THAN FOU RTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF THIS ORDER, KORNAFEL SHALL SHOW CAUSE BY FILING A RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES STATING WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT ENJOIN HIM FROM FILING ANY MORE CIVIL ACTIONS CONCERNING THE IDENTICAL, UNTIMELY ALLEGATIONS HE HAS RAISED IN THIS CASE AS WELL AS KORNAFEL V. U.S. POSTAL SERV., CIV. A. NO. 19-2292; KORNAFEL V. U.S. POSTAL SERV., CIV. A. NO. 99-6416; KORNAFEL V. UNITED STATES, CIV. A. NO. 00-3250; KORNAFEL V. U.S. GOVERNMENT, CIV. A. N O. 96-7436; AND KORNAFEL V. U.S. GOVERNMENT, CIV. A. NO. 95-6670; NAMELY THAT THE LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT OF A MARCH 11, 1992 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT INVOLVING A POSTAL SERVICE VEHICLE RESULTED IN AN ABUSE OF PROCESS, DECEIT, BIAS, AND OTHER IRREGUL ARITIES AND SHOULD KORNAFEL FAIL TO FILE A RESPONSE AS DIRECTED BY PARAGRAPH 4, THE COURT SHALL WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICE ENTER AN ORDER ENJOINING KORNAFEL FROM FILING ANY FUTURE SIMILAR LAWSUITS WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION OF THE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/18/20. 9/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STANLEY E. KORNAFEL,
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-4503

ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2020, upon consideration of Plaintiff Stanley E.
Kornafel’s pro se Complaint (ECF No. 1), it is ORDERED that:
1.

The Complaint is DEEMED filed.

2.

The Complaint is DISMISSED as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for the reasons discussed in the Court’s Memorandum.
3.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

4.

No later than fourteen days from the date of the mailing of this Order, Kornafel

shall SHOW CAUSE by filing a “Response to Show Cause Order” not to exceed ten pages
stating why the Court should not enjoin him from filing any more civil actions concerning the
identical, untimely allegations he has raised in this case as well as Kornafel v. U.S. Postal Serv.,
Civ. A. No. 19-2292; Kornafel v. U.S. Postal Serv., Civ. A. No. 99-6416; Kornafel v. United
States, Civ. A. No. 00-3250; Kornafel v. U.S. Government, Civ. A. No. 96-7436; and Kornafel v.
U.S. Government, Civ. A. No. 95-6670; namely that the litigation and settlement of a March 11,
1992 motor vehicle accident involving a postal service vehicle resulted in an abuse of process,
deceit, bias, and other irregularities.

5.

Should Kornafel fail to file a Response as directed by Paragraph 4, the Court shall

without any further notice enter an order enjoining Kornafel from filing any future similar
lawsuits without prior permission of the Court.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
C. Darnell Jones, II J.

2