BRANZINO, INC. v. SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Filing 28

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 10 ) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY REGARDING REGULATORY ESTOPPEL IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 2/6/24. 2/6/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRANZINO, INC., Plaintiff, v. SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : Civ. No. 20-4912 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10), Plaintiff’s Responses in Opposition (Doc. Nos. 14, 25), Defendant’s Replies in Support (Doc. Nos. 15, 26), and all related submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Discovery Regarding Regulatory Estoppel is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond ________________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?