BRANZINO, INC. v. SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Filing
28
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 10 ) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY REGARDING REGULATORY ESTOPPEL IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 2/6/24. 2/6/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRANZINO, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 20-4912
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10), Plaintiff’s Responses in Opposition (Doc. Nos. 14, 25),
Defendant’s Replies in Support (Doc. Nos. 15, 26), and all related submissions, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Discovery Regarding Regulatory Estoppel is DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
________________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?