RIZZO v. NUTANIX, INC. et al

Filing 27

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS'S MOTION TO DISMISS #10 AND #19 ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3-31-2021. 3-31-2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl, )

Download PDF
i IN THE UNrl'ED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAMUEL P. RIZZO, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION v. NUTANIX, INC. et al., Defendants No. 20-5140 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2021, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10), Mr. Rizzo's Response in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 17), Defendants' Supplemental Briefing Regarding the Statute of Limitations (Doc. No. 19), Mr. Rizzo's Supplemental Briefing Regarding the Statute of Limitations (Doc. No. 20), oral argument held on March 22, 2021, and the parties' post-argument submissions (Doc. Nos. 24, 25), it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 10, 19) are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics. BY THE COURT: ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?