TAGGART v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, et al
Filing
64
ORDERED THAT TAGGARTS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT TAGGARTS MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, (ECF 39), IS DENIED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/3/21. 6/3/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH TAGGART,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 20-05503
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of June 2021, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motions to Dismiss, (ECF 24, 25), Taggart’s Responses, (ECF 26, 31), Defendants’
Replies, (ECF 30, 32), and the parties’ supplemental briefing, (ECF 35, 36, 37, 38), it is
ORDERED that Taggart’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is
further ORDERED that Taggart’s Motion for Injunctive Relief, (ECF 39), is DENIED.
Upon consideration of the Court’s Order to Show Cause, (ECF 52), Thomas’s
Response, (ECF 54), and following a Show Cause Hearing, (ECF 58), it is ORDERED
that Thomas shall:
1. Pay $2,500 into the Court’s registry on or before July 2, 2021;
2. Provide a copy of this Order, the corresponding Memorandum Opinion and the
transcript of the Show Cause Hearing to the disciplinary committee for every
state bar and every federal court to which he is admitted on or before July 2,
2021;
1
3. Provide a copy of this Order, the corresponding Memorandum Opinion and the
transcript of the Show Cause Hearing to all judges presiding over any pending
proceeding in which he is involved on or before June 14, 2021; and
4. Within ten days of completing each requirement, file sworn statements and proof
of delivery of these materials with the Court via email at
Chambers_of_Judge_Pappert@paed.uscourts.gov.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
_________________________________
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?