SULLIVAN v. WIDENER UNIVERSITY
Filing
27
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 , PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE 17 , AND DEFENDANTS REPLY 18 , AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/1/22. 8/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
Case 2:20-cv-05614-MMB Document 27 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICK T. SULLIVAN
v.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 20-5614
WIDENER UNIVERSITY
ORDER RE. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF 12), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF 17), and Defendant’s Reply (ECF 18),
and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 20\20-5614 Sullivan v Widener Univ\20cv5614 SJ order.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?