SCOTT v. RANSOM et al

Filing 10

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 9) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PETITIONERS PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 1) IS DENIED. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 11/13/23. 11/13/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NALIK SHARIFF SCOTT,
Petitioner,
v.
KEVIN RANSOM, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV- 6198

ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2023, upon careful and independent consideration
of Petitioner Nalik Shariff Scott’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (ECF No. 1) and his
counseled “Memorandum of Law” in support thereto (ECF No. 7), the Government’s response in
opposition (ECF No. 8), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Richard A. Lloret (ECF No. 9), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
_______________
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.