BLAKEY v. PISTRO
Filing
14
ORDER THAT THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. & 1915 (e)(20(B) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 6/7/21. 6/7/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LESLIE BLAKEY,
Plaintiff,
V.
KEVIN PISTRO,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 2:21-cv-572-JDW
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff Leslie
Blakey’s pro se Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12), it is ORDERED that the
Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joshua D. Wolson
JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?