TALBERT v. EVERS et al
ORDER THAT WE DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS, FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED. WE DENY THE INCARCERATED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BASED ENTIRELY UPON HIS INCORPORATED COMPLAINT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE; ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/4/21. 6/4/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH H. EVERS, et al.
: CIVIL ACTION
: NO. 21-2505
AND NOW, this 4th day of June 2021, upon screening the pro se incarcerated Plaintiff’s
Complaint against two state court judges and a state court administrator for violating civil rights
but no specific allegations as to harm to him and mindful the state court judges and court
administrator are immune from monetary damages and he otherwise cannot state a claim for
equitable relief, consistent with Congress’s requirement of screening prisoner complaints under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
We DISMISS the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 1) with prejudice as frivolous,
failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and seeks monetary relief and punitive
damages from immune judges and court administrator;
We DENY the incarcerated Plaintiff’s Motion for injunctive relief and temporary
restraining order (ECF Doc. No. 3) based entirely upon his incorporated complaint; and,
The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?