REDMOND v. WETZEL et al

Filing 19

ORDER THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT A HEARING. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE AS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR CONCLUDING THAT REASONABLE JURISTS COULD DEBATE WHETHER... THE PETITION SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESOLVED IN A DIFFERENT MANNER OR THAT THE ISSUES PRESENTED WERE ADEQUATE TO DESERVE ENCOURAGEMENT TO PROCEED FURTHER; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/9/24. 5/9/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAQUAWAN REDMOND
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-2652

WETZEL, et al.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2024, for the reasons stated in the Order approving the
Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without a hearing.

2.

A certificate of appealability will not issue as there is no basis for concluding that

“reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different
manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed
further;” 1 and
3.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J

1

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal citation and quotation omitted).