MUHAMMAD v. FIGUREROA et al

Filing 7

ORDER THAT MUHAMMADS CLAIM PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 1983 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. MUHAMMADS STATE LAW CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 1/7/22. 1/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-03372-CFK Document 7 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREEM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA FIGUREROA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-CV-3372 ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Kareem Muhammad’s pro se Complaint (ECF No. 1) it is ORDERED that: 1. Muhammad’s claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons in the Court’s Memorandum. Muhammad’s state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Chad F. Kenney CHAD F. KENNEY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?