WALSH et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 13

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 AND THE RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFFS JAMES AND COLLETTE WALSH 11 , AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OF LAW, IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFEN DANTS MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL MEET AND CONFER REGARDING PROPOSED PRETRIAL DEADLINES AND DATES FOR TRIAL AND SHALL SUBMIT AN AGREED-UPON PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS ACTION FOR THE COURTS CONSIDERA TION ON OR BEFORE FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2022. IF THE PARTIES BELIEVE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT W. REID WOULD BE PRODUCTIVE, THEY SHOULD CONTACT MY CHAMBERS PROMPTLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/21/22. 11/21/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-04464-BMS Document 13 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES WALSH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 21-4464 ORDER AND NOW this 21st day of November, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 10) and the Response of Plaintiffs James and Collette Walsh (ECF 11), and consistent with the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding proposed pretrial deadlines and dates for trial and shall submit an agreed-upon proposed schedule for the remainder of this action for the Court’s consideration on or before Friday, December 2, 2022. If the parties believe a settlement conference before U.S. Magistrate Judge Scott W. Reid would be productive, they should contact my chambers promptly. BY THE COURT: Berle M. Schiller, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?