BELFI v. BANCORP et al

Filing 7

ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM AS FOLLOWS:. ANY CLAIMS FOR RELIEF BARRED BY ROOKER-FELDMAN ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.. ALL FEDERAL LAW CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ALL STATE LAW CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION BELFIS MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (ECF NO. #3 ) AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY (ECF NO. #4 ) ARE DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 1/10/22. 1/10/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)

Case 2:21-cv-05672-JP Document 7 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALEX BELFI,
Plaintiff,
v.
RADIUS BANCORP, et al.
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-CV-5672

ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Alex Belfi’s
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2), pro se Complaint (ECF No. 1), Motion for
Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3), and Motion for Leave to File Electronically (ECF No. 4),
it is ORDERED that:
1.

Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2.

The Complaint is DEEMED filed.

3.

The Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons in the Court’s Memorandum as follows:
a.

Any claims for relief barred by Rooker-Feldman are DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
b.

All federal law claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

c.

All state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction
4.

Belfi’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3) and Motion for Leave to

Case 2:21-cv-05672-JP Document 7 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2

File Electronically (ECF No. 4) are DENIED.
5.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova
JOHN R. PADOVA, J.