Robinson et al v. Pottstown Area Rapid Transit, Inc. et al

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 13 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFFS ANTHONY AND VALERIE ROBINSON'S RETALIATION CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 9/16/22. 9/16/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-00655-KSM Document 22 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION ANTHONY T. ROBINSON, SR., et al., Plaintiffs, NO. 22-655-KSM v. POTTSTOWN AREA RAPID TRANSIT, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13) and Plaintiffs’ response (Doc. No. 14), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs Anthony and Valerie Robinson’s retaliation claims are DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Karen Spencer Marston _____________________________ KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?