Gainey aka Naree Abdullah et al v. PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 109

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 79) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT II, COUNT III, AND COUNT IV. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO COUNT I AND COUNT IV. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/12/2025. 3/12/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NAREE ABDULLAH, a/k/a GRENILE
GAINEY and JARMAINE TRICE, a/k/a
ERIC GREENE,
Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION
v.

NO. 22 -4143

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW this 12th day of March, 2025, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
Memorandum Opinion, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 79) is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as
to Count II (§ 1983 Conspiracy), Count III (Failure to Intervene), and Count IV (Monell claim,
as it is predicated on an unconstitutional policy or a failure to train, supervise, or discipline). The
Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Count I (Deliberate Deception) and Count IV
(Monell claim, as it is predicated on an unconstitutional custom).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

\\adu.dcn\paed\PHL-DATA\Judge_Baylson\CIVIL 22\22-4143 Gainey et al v. Philadelphia et al\22-4143 MSJ
Order.docx

1