HALL v. SEPTA et al

Filing 19

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. DEFENDANTS MOTIONS ARE GRANTED. 2. PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. 4. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/27/2024. 3/27/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAUL HALL,
v.
SEPTA, et al.,

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 22-4759

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant, SEPTA’s,
Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 10), Defendant, Transport Workers Union Local 234’s,
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12), Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion
(ECF No. 17), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motions are GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. Plaintiff’s Motion is DISMISSED as moot.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter as CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ R. Barclay Surrick
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.