ROLLSTOCK, INC. v. SUPPLYONE, INC.
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND INSPECTION (ECF NO. 1 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO REQUEST NUMBERS 2-6, 11-12, 14-15, 17, AND 20.THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO REQUEST NUMBERS 1, 7-10, 13, 16, 18, AND 21.ALL MUST PRODUCE DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO THESE REQUESTS TO THE EXTENT IT HAS NOTALREADY PROVIDED SUCH DOCUMENTS TO SUPPLYONE OR ROLLSTOCK; AND THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO ROLLSTOCKS REQUEST TO INSPECT THE MACHINE ANDALL IS ORDERED TO PERMIT SUCH AN INSPECTION; AND ALL SHALL PRODUCE ALL RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THIS ORDER AND SHALL PERMIT ROLLSTOCK TO CONDUCT AN INSPECTION OF THE MACHINE WITHIN 45 DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 5/6/22. 5/6/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
Case 2:22-mc-00020-RBS Document 4 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 6th day of May 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Rollstock’s Motion
to Compel Production and Inspection (ECF No. 1), and all documents submitted in support
thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part as follows:
The Motion is DENIED as to Request Numbers 2-6, 11-12, 14-15, 17, and 20;
The Motion is GRANTED as to Request Numbers 1, 7-10, 13, 16, 18, and 21.
ALL must produce documents responsive to these requests to the extent it has not
already provided such documents to SupplyOne or Rollstock; and
The Motion is GRANTED as to Rollstock’s request to inspect the Machine and
ALL is ordered to permit such an inspection; and
ALL shall produce all responsive documents within 20 days of this Order and shall permit
Rollstock to conduct an inspection of the Machine within 45 days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
_/s/ R. Barclay Surrick______
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?