LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE J. CHASAN, LLC et al v. PIERCE et al
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT, FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOHN M. PIERCE, JAMES D. BAINBRIDGE, PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT, LLP, BAINBRIDGE LAW APC, PIERCE BAINBRIDGE P.C., AND JOHN PIERCE LAW, P.C. ARE DISMISSED.SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 3/27/24. 3/27/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE J.
CHASAN, LLC, et al.
Plaintiffs
v.
JOHN M. PIERCE, ESQ., et al.
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 23-0648
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), (ECF 12), Plaintiffs’
response in opposition, (ECF 15), Defendants’ reply, (ECF 18), Plaintiffs’ sur-reply, (ECF 23),
and the allegations in the complaint, (ECF 1), it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set
forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
Accordingly, all claims asserted against Defendants John M. Pierce, James D. Bainbridge, Pierce
Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht, LLP, Bainbridge Law APC, Pierce Bainbridge P.C., and John
Pierce Law, P.C. are DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO
Judge, United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?