ARAOYE v. VILSACK

Filing 61

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS HARRISON, NIEMI AND JEMMERSON ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FROM THIS CASE AS OUTLINED HEREIN. FURTHER ORDERED PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. VILSACKS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TERMINATE THIS MATTER AND MARK IT CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/5/24. 2/5/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAMUEL O. ARAOYE a/k/a ELLSWORTH D., Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 23-1331 THOMAS J. VILSACK, JOSEPH HARRISON, STEPHANIE NIEMI, and DENNIS JEMMERSON, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 5th of February 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Substitute Certain Defendants (ECF No. 53), Plaintiff’s response thereto (ECF No. 54), and the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 55-59), it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Joseph Harrison, Stephanie Niemi, and Dennis Jemmerson are DISMISSED from this case and Plaintiff’s claims for damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendant Thomas J. Vilsack’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE this matter and mark it CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?