KELLY v. KINDER MORGAN, INC.

Filing 33

ORDER that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 8/28/24. 8/28/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRUCE KELLY, JR.,
Plaintiff
v.
KINDER MORGAN, INC.,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 23-1595

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2024, it is ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED as to
Plaintiff’s ADA reasonable accommodations and hostile work environment claims,
his FMLA interference claim, his ADEA claim, and his PHRA claims alleging
failure to offer reasonable accommodations, hostile work environment, and age
discrimination. Defendant’s motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s adverse-action
and retaliation ADA claims, his FMLA retaliation claim, and his PHRA claim
asserting adverse action disability discrimination and retaliation.

_s/ANITA B. BRODY, J._______
ANITA B. BRODY, J.