CUSTER v. GREEN et al

Filing 11

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO AMEND IS GRANTED. 2. ALL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. 3. ALL STATE LAW CLAIMS IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. 4. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 12/1/23. 12/1/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTHONY JOSEPH CUSTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
JASON GREEN, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-CV-1903

ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2023, upon consideration of Plaintiff
Anthony Joseph Custer’s pro se Amended Complaint (ECF No. 8) and his Motion to
Amend (ECF No. 9), it is ORDERED that:

1.

The Motion to Amend is GRANTED.

2.

All constitutional claims in the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons in the Court’s Memorandum.

3.

All state law claims in the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

4.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.