ROSADO v. WHITCRAFT et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM, ROSADO'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ALL STATE LAW CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE; ETC.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/26/24. 3/26/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES A. WHITCRAFT, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-CV-3717

ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff
Geronimo F. Rosado, Jr.’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6), it is ORDERED that:

1.

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum, Rosado’s Amended

Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART
WITHOUT PREJUDICE as follows:
a. All federal civil rights claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and all Fair
Housing Act claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure
to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
b. All state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

2.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.