GEORGE v. PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.

Filing 21

ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 25), AND PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AND THIS CASE IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(1). SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/3/2025. 1/3/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DANIEL GEORGE,
Civil Action

Plaintiff,

No. 23-cv-3939

v.
PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2025, upon consideration of Defendant Piedmont
Airlines, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 25), and Plaintiff’s Response
in opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and this case is
DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1).
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
________________________________
Mitchell S. Goldberg,
J.