FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 73

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 58) AND THE RESPONSES THERETO (ECF NOS. 67, 68) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM O PINION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE A MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 69), THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS GRANTED BUT HIS REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/27/2024. 8/29/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDREW FULLMAN,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.

NO. 24-969

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
for Sanctions (ECF No. 58) and the Responses thereto (ECF Nos. 67, 68) it is HEREBY
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set
forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. It is FURTHER ORDERED, upon
consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave of Court to File a Motion for Sanctions
(ECF No. 69), that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED but his request for sanctions is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/S/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.