BRUNNER et al v. ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 13

ORDERED THAT: (1)THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT ALLSTATE VEHICLE ANDPROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS BAD FAITH CLAIM (DOC. #9) IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS ALLEGATION IN PARAGRAPH 28(B) OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #6); (2)THE MOTION IS OTHERWISE GRANTED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 6/4/2024. 6/5/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NEIL BRUNNER, et al.
v.
ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY
INSURANCE COMPANY

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 24-1293

ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2024, for the reasons
stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) the motion of Defendant Allstate Vehicle and
Property Insurance Company to dismiss Plaintiffs’ bad faith
claim (Doc. #9) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ allegation in
Paragraph 28(b) of the Amended Complaint (Doc. #6);
(2) the motion is otherwise GRANTED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.