ANDERSON v. BARITZ et al
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PMC PROPERTY GROUP'S MOTION TO DISMISS 23 IS GRANTED. ANDERSON'S CLAIMS AGAINST PMC ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ANDERSON MAY AMEND AGAIN, ON OR BEFORE 2/26/25, CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORDANDU M OPINION. IF ANDERSON HAS NOT FILED A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY THEN, THE COURT WILL DISMISS HER CLAIMS AGAINST PMC WITH PREJUDICE. THE BARITZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 24 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/27/25. 1/27/25 ENTERED & E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO ANDERSON. (fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Eva Anderson,
Plaintiff,
v.
Kenneth L. Baritz, Esq., Baritz Law
Associates, LLC, PMC Property Group,
Inc.,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 24-2095
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of January 2025, upon consideration of PMC Property
Group’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23), the Motion to Dismiss by Kenneth L. Baritz
and Baritz Law Associates (ECF Nos. 24 & 25), Anderson’s Consolidated Response in
Opposition (ECF No. 30), PMC’s Reply in Support (ECF No. 32), and the Baritz
Defendants’ Reply in Support (ECF No. 31), it is ORDERED that:
1. PMC’s Motion is GRANTED. Anderson’s claims against PMC are
DISMISSED without prejudice, and Anderson may amend again, on or
before February 26, 2025, consistent with the accompanying Memorandum
Opinion. If Anderson has not filed a Second Amended Complaint by then, the
Court will dismiss her claims against PMC with prejudice.
2. The Baritz Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
Gerald J. Pappert, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?