ANDERSON v. BARITZ et al

Filing 34

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PMC PROPERTY GROUP'S MOTION TO DISMISS 23 IS GRANTED. ANDERSON'S CLAIMS AGAINST PMC ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ANDERSON MAY AMEND AGAIN, ON OR BEFORE 2/26/25, CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORDANDU M OPINION. IF ANDERSON HAS NOT FILED A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY THEN, THE COURT WILL DISMISS HER CLAIMS AGAINST PMC WITH PREJUDICE. THE BARITZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 24 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/27/25. 1/27/25 ENTERED & E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO ANDERSON. (fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Eva Anderson, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth L. Baritz, Esq., Baritz Law Associates, LLC, PMC Property Group, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 24-2095 Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of January 2025, upon consideration of PMC Property Group’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23), the Motion to Dismiss by Kenneth L. Baritz and Baritz Law Associates (ECF Nos. 24 & 25), Anderson’s Consolidated Response in Opposition (ECF No. 30), PMC’s Reply in Support (ECF No. 32), and the Baritz Defendants’ Reply in Support (ECF No. 31), it is ORDERED that: 1. PMC’s Motion is GRANTED. Anderson’s claims against PMC are DISMISSED without prejudice, and Anderson may amend again, on or before February 26, 2025, consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. If Anderson has not filed a Second Amended Complaint by then, the Court will dismiss her claims against PMC with prejudice. 2. The Baritz Defendants’ Motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert Gerald J. Pappert, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?