MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al

Filing 29

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 9) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. WE OVERRULE THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. NO. 10-19). THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE PETITI ON FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 2) IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO BASIS TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN F MURPHY ON 11/22/2024. 11/22/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ahf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
v.
JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES,
WILBUR JONES, JAMES CLARK,
BARRY MOORE, DENNY GREEN

: CIVIL ACTION
:
: NO. 24-2553
:
:
:
:
ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November 2024, upon independent consideration of the
petition for writ of habeas corpus (DI 2), after review of Judge Carlos’s Report and
Recommendation (DI 9), petitioner’s objections (DI 10-19), and for reasons in the accompanying
memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1.

The Report and Recommendation (DI 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2.

We OVERRULE the petitioner’s objections (DI 10-19).

3.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the supplemental motion

(DI 1, 21) are DENIED as moot.
4.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus (DI 2) is DENIED and DISMISSED with

prejudice.
5.

There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability.

6.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

____________________
MURPHY, J.