CLARY v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
20
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 9) AND DEFENDANTS THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY AND MICHAEL RHOADES' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL (DOC. NO. 13) ARE DENIED. TO THE EXTENT THAT PLAINTIFF'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS IS A MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, THAT MOTION (DOC. NO. 9 AT 3-4) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 3/7/2025. 3/7/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO UNREPS.(ahf)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KANYE CLARY,
Plaintiff
v.
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 24-cv-6793
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of March 2025, upon consideration of the docket, Plaintiff’s
Motion for Remand (ECF No. 9), and Defendants The Pennsylvania State University and Michael
Rhoades’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Notice of Removal (ECF No. 13), it is hereby
ORDERED that both Motions (ECF Nos. 9 and 13) are DENIED. To the extent that Plaintiff’s
voluntary dismissal of claims is a Motion to Amend the Complaint, that Motion (ECF No. 9 at 3–
4) is GRANTED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Chad F. Kenney
_________________________
CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
