KOSMOSKI v. THE EXPRESS TIMES NEWSPAPER

Filing 25

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS RULE 56(F) AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUED AS A MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY, IS GRANTED. AN AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER WILL BE DOCKETED; DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGME NT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW BY THE DATE SET FORTH IN THE COURTS FORTHCOMING AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER; AND DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW BY THE DATE SET FORTH IN THE COURTS FORTHCOMING AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS M. GOLDEN ON 8/19/09. 8/24/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(la, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NIKKI KOSMOSKI Plaintiff vs. EXPRESS TIMES NEWSPAPER Defendant : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-CV-1555 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15), Defendant's Errata to its Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16), Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Affidavit in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18), Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Affidavit (Doc. No. 22), Plaintiff's Sur-reply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), and Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence (Doc. No. 14), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Affidavit in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18), which will be construed as a motion to extend discovery, is GRANTED. An Amended Scheduling Order will be docketed; 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW by the date set forth in the Court's forthcoming Amended Scheduling Order; and 3. Defendant's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW by the date set forth in the Court's forthcoming Amended Scheduling Order. BY THE COURT: /s/ Thomas M. Golden THOMAS M. GOLDEN, J. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?