VEGA SOTO v. BANK OF LANCASTER COUNTY

Filing 48

MEMORANDUM/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CONTINUE TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 3/22/11. 3/23/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
VEGA SOTO v. BANK OF LANCASTER COUNTY Doc. 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SERGIO VEGA SOTO, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff vs. BANK OF LANCASTER COUNTY, also known as BLC Bank, N.A., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O R D E R NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2011, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Motion for Reconsideration, which motion was filed by plaintiff on April 13, 2010 (Document 39); Brief of Defendant Bank of Lancaster County in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's March 30, 2010 Order Dismissing the Case, which memorandum was filed April 27, 2010 (Document 40); and Reply Brief in Further Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, which reply brief was filed by plaintiff on May 4, 2010 (Document 41); Civil Action No. 08-cv-1907 (2) (3) upon consideration of the pleadings, exhibits, record papers, and the briefs of the parties; and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall continue to mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ James Knoll Gardner James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge -ii-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?