CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED et al

Filing 101

ORDER THAT UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN ITS FAVOR ON COUNT VIII OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ALLEGING UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER THE LANHAM ACT (DOC. NO. 78), PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY; MOTION IS GRANTED. COUNT VIII OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/18/2011. 8/19/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP., : Plaintiff : : v. : : ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES : INC., et al., : Defendants CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-2907 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2011, upon careful consideration of the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment in its favor on Count VIII of the Second Amended Complaint alleging unfair competition under the Lanham Act (Document No. 78), plaintiff’s response thereto, and defendant’s reply, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Count VIII of the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?