BERNHARD v. BROWN & BROWN OF LEHIGH VALLEY, INC. et al

Filing 40

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 30) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FLMA INTERFERENCE CLAIM AND PLAINTIFF'S FMLA RETALIATION CLAIM. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/10/10. 6/14/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY BERNHARD, Plaintiff, v. BROWN & BROWN OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC., et al., Defendants.

: : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-4335

ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of June 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement (Docket No. 30), Plaintiff's Opposition thereto (Docket Nos. 31, 32), and all other related briefing (Docket Nos. 36, 38), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's FLMA interference claim and Plaintiff's FMLA retaliation claim. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in all other respects.

2.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E. K. PRATTER UN IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE