MITCHELL PARTNERS, L.P. v. IREX CORPORATION et al

Filing 43

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/28/2010. 9/29/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Download PDF
MITCHELL PARTNERS, L.P. v. IREX CORPORATION et al Doc. 43 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MITCHELL PARTNERS, L.P., Plaintiff vs. IREX CORPORATION; NORTH LIME HOLDINGS CORP.; W. KIRK LIDDELL; DAVID C. KLEINMAN; PAUL J. ISAAC; JOANN M. JUDGE; MICHAEL J. LARDNER; JOHN O. SHIRK; THOMAS W. WOLF; LORI A. PICKELL; JAMES E. HIPOLIT; JANE E. PINKERTON; KENNETH G. STOUDT; and N. THOMPSON WASHBURN, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 08-cv-04814 ORDER NOW, this 28th day of September, 2010, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Action ("Motion to Dismiss"), and the Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Action, which motion and memorandum were filed September 29, 2009; Plaintiff Mitchell Partners L.P.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Action, which response was filed September 29, 2009; and Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Action, which reply was filed September 29, 2009; (2) (3) and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying Opinion, Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ James Knoll Gardner James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge - ii -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?