SCHNETTLER v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER, PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY.SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/25/10. 1/25/10 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GAREY SCHNETTLER v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
: : : : :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-5811
ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review (Document No. 10), the defendant's response (Document No. 13), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Document No. 15), and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED1; The plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four
of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey.
/Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Magistrate Judge Hey's review and analysis of the record are thorough and discerning. Her c o n c lu s io n s and recom m e n d a tio n s are well reasoned and thoughtful. No additional com m e n ts could im p r o v e upon her report and recom m e n d a t io n .
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?